Revisiting the comments from 2016, I thought I'd see if there was anything new to say about this great cosmological mystery. I have, since that time (2016), been writing some things marginally philosophical. The great thing about physics and cosmology is that these fields offer much room for philosophic musings. And food for other aspects of imagination. In a short paper, titled: To Infinity, and Then Some, I wrote my notions about the significance of infinity, in light of some of those of men like Locke. Mr. Locke worried the topic almost into a migraine, without really saying much of anything intelligible. I said that it really did not matter a whole lot what we think about infinity. It has little impact upon everyday life (unless you are a thinker, physicist, cosmologist, or philosopher). It is not a destination. Nor is it a goal or an objective. Neither you nor I nor anyone else will ever get there, because there is no 'there' to get to. So what about this big bang thing? Pretty much the same blind alley, seems to me. Unless understanding leads to practical applications (such as, say, interstellar travel) the science of such knowledge is nice to know---maybe even elegant, but not all that useful to the pragmatist. When we let the atomic D jinn out of his bottle, we found out, soon enough the problematic of all that. So, do not worry over the Big Bang. Unless you fear a collapsing universe. Even then, it is well to remember there is diddly you can do about it.

The problem of stating a big bang is the problem of solving the einstein equations correctly according to the boundary conditions. At exactly that state mathematical considerations come into place , how about two charged rotating black holes in the galaxy and a simple capacitor that is getting loaded in lets say 60 parsec's distance, although the loading of a capacitor is a simple thing in electrostatics it turns out that that exactly this loading in a quite far neglectable distance could be some kind of unsolvable for general relativity. How come that the boundary
conditions are some kind of obstruse to formulate the problem of loading a capacitor in a superfar distance of two
rotating and charged black holes. This is an astronomical event , due to the fact , that interstellar clouds can load via
friction huge amount of charges and then destore it via deloading via two cloud fronts of two interstellar clouds.
Thus the weird imagination of charging a capacitor in a large distance is set to real existing astronomical features , two clouds , producing via friction against each other the charging of a capacitor , but how to fomulate the solving of the boundary conditons for the differential forms of general relativity. Is there truly a unique solution ? Who knows , perhaps i will never perceive a glimpse to this question.

There is a basic misconception in your presentation today. Cosmologists such as Max Tegmark believe that our universe, which started with a big bang, is only one of many universes with a variety of physical laws and values for fundamental constants. The universe we live in has physical constants which allow life to evolve. There could be other such universes along with universes with no life. So, it is a mistake to speak of "the universe" when you are speaking only about our universe. These ideas spring from string and brane theory.

The results showed that it was we can encountered to gained new information through sciences and create stories of "Big Bang" theories their description what is being said, read, heard, or viewed and supposed how the world be doing we that you don't know everything. What's the " teutonic" is yet our introspective mind like World War II targeting the destruction of the earth.We don't have the demand but it's like nuclear instincts thus could change throughout the philosophical revolution.The concern is what dominates of preserving our human freedom. The American Declaration of Independence of 1776 states. We hold these truths that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. That governments among men deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. Given the issues of the involvement and chaos of the American internationally but in the Universe known to recognize break the barrier of the history. We know the issues when its my chance to rise we could imagine our dreams. As people there's no place in the world who once sensed that they inhabited the intellectual margins of the contemporary world because war of the geo-philosophy we know that nothing can be as debilitating as the constant production of proof of one's significance. The fear is why moral reflection have always a societal contradiction by that power of the unrest differention of authority (Dahrendorf 1987).There are two possible explanations 1. It could attract our concern 2. Beyond of owning what is "big bang" theories and who created to our democracy. Because there is "hazardous" to debate of their expertize rather than our ability to maintain law and order. The benefits of conflicts for it knew now where it was going and it said to itself. There are theories were made for all people to think of metaphysical truths but irrepressibly in pursuing progress and reform. Likewise, we became normal and accordingly of the philosophers and later scientist gradually of their ideas of natural and rational order with conceptions formulations of change.In this regard, God as creator of the supernatural and His faith and his tendency to scientific reasoning.