Schoenberg breaks the matter down to rhythm, tone, and something he called "color". "Color" being the human part. And yet, what he produced was more like machne music than ever.
A more philosophically interesting opposition is between lyric and beat. Which, semantics or syntax, subject or predicate, antecedent or extension, premise or conclusion, the equation or its reduction, takes precedence? Is music poetry or dirge? Is it driven by the meaning and humanity of the sense expressed? Or by the syncopation of time? If human, music is the expression of a breach in the pace of time. If tempo or beat, humanity is the slave of time.

I have always loved music, and, once-upon-a-time, played for my breakfast, lunch and supper, etc. But, playing music as a profession left a lot to be desired. Anyway, I still enjoy listening to most musical genres and will entertain changes in style and content, as long as the music remains. For example, I have been noticing big differences in today's country music (it used to be called country and western, but that characterization is now pretty well extinct, near as I can tell). Country music now sounds more like pop music, or perhaps better: rock and roll, with a twang. It is no longer all about cheaters, drunks and other social misfits, but, when such themes are portrayed, the music is often bright and cheery,even when it is certain that "we are never, ever getting back together". It's bubble-gummy, but, it's cute. Evolution, I guess... Apparently, this new-wave country is making its' writers and performers wealthy. Good for them.
I do not get rap and hip hop. Not musical to me. Lots of yelling and hot air; degradation of women and the rule of law; lots of glorification of violence; in short: a promotion of anarchy and the primacy of doing whatever one pleases, at any cost, including getting shot for one's trouble. I have also noticed that artists(?) of this genre frequently die for their trouble. So, I don't get all of that but suppose it must be an outgrowth of the hopelessness of our turbulent times. I grew up in turbulent times. Everyone has, but there are different ways of reacting to that.
I prefer classical music and jazz these days. What did the man say?: life is ninety percent what happens to you and ten percent how you react to that. Some such formula. As has always been the case, music can be a force for good or for evil. Some things remain the same, with or without turbulent times and their seeming hopelessness. A good beer doesn't hurt. Much.
Neuman

I always love musing, It helps me to pass my time, for refreshment, to reduce pain and some others. I listen music when I feel sorrow or when I am unhappy. I also listen music I am happy and excited. Various types of emotion, various kinds of music and various kinds of lyrics. In a short sentence music is a great part of our life.
Anyway your website is full of informative. If you think you need articles then just ask rush essay and give topics. They will write for you.

The greatest mistakes of any polity in history is to support a candidate on the assumption he does not mean what he says. There is a scene in the Star Trek Movie, The Journey Home, in which Spock and Kirk are riding a bus across 1970's San Francisco. Across from them on the bus is a "skinhead" playing a "boom-box" so loudly they cannot carry on a discussion. The song, "And I hate you, and I berate you, and I hate you too!" When asked to turn down the noise the "skinhead " (actually, he's wearing a Mohawk) turns it up instead, at which Spock reaches over and applies the Vulcan nerve pinch. Silence ensued, and the other riders applauded. But I rather think the Trump phenomenon divides America between those who are with that punk and the rest of us with those other riders who applauded the respite from him. We'll see in November. Very useful post and i really like your work! thanks a lot or sharing! Android APK Download apkdom Love fun advises ideas lovematchfun join now. Pokemon Go Gym Battle Simulator, Evolution Calculator, IV calculator CP, Pokemon Go Map Locations pokevolver The Best Prank Apps, jokes and shocking Games for Android. prankyapps electric screen. Free Android APK download softlot. Top Best advices, howto, movies, games, top10, reviews topbestis. Gift Ideas and advices giftspilot gifts for her and kids. Cheers! Android app games APK downloader Download Fake GPS Pro Apk. best safe APK downloader free download server Get Pokemon GO APK apk file.

Have to say that I was a bit disappointed by this discussion. First of all, the guest was really not a music expert, but an historian who wrote a book about James Bond theme songs. Adrian Daub is — according to his bio— a "Professor of Comparative Literature German Studies at Stanford University" ... I don't see any music expertise among his credentials. ( http://stanford.academia.edu/AdrianDaub/CurriculumVitae )

Also, there was no mention of the actual physical nature of music. Music isn't just an idea, it's a physical phenomenon resulting from organized vibrations ... organized tonally and rhythmically. These vibrations follow a pattern which is not at all arbitrary, but which follow harmonic patterns which come directly from nature. We, as living organisms resonate with the harmonic structures of music throughout our bodies, not just in our ears or our imaginations. How can you have a real conversation about our understanding of music ... the "meaning" of music if you don't include the physics of music and the physical connection we have to it ... even on a fundamental level ... Yes, you did have a bit about Stravinsky's Rite of Spring as an example of "dissonance" which confounds our expectations, but this is a hackneyed example which does not hold up under scrutiny, nor does the bit about predictability being satisfying. None of these segments of the show really touched on the nature of music on a basic level ... just one mention of the harmonic series and how all musical forms across the world and throughout time are based on this naturally occurring tonal phenomenon would have been better than all the befuddled discussion of which songs your panelists listen to at breakfast.

For a program based on "Philosophy" I would think you might have at least mentioned the role Pythagoras played in defining the musical intervals which are used in most of the music we are familiar with. Instead, the conversation centered on a few pop songs and vague commentary about what each panelist did or didn't feel good about or otherwise unscholarly mumbling from the hosts comparing music to beer.

There's only so much you can cover in an hour, but at least you could start with some rudimentary understanding of what music is in the first place on a primal level. Humans have been making music since pre-history. the hosts of the show seemed almost proud of their ignorance of the subject.

I'd say this topic should be revisited, this time with a guest who actually has a real music background who can address the essential nature of music beyond pop culture references.